Legal Opinion

Shin v. Bosart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7827PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The record in this case presents a single question of law, and that question is: Can a married wo-

man whose husband is insane, but whose insanity has not been judicially declared, make a valid contract concerning her separate real property?

The answer to this question depends upon the construction to be given the act of March 11th, 1861, 1 R. S. 1876, p. 555. The 1st section of that act, omitting the enacting clause, reads as follows: “That all married women, or those who may be hereafter married, whose husbands are, or may be insane, are during the continuance of such insanity, hereby…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tracey v. CrepinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Sperry v. DickinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Jocelyn v. Charles G.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Maloney v. Home Loan & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Teeter v. NewcomIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API