Shin v. Bosart
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— The record in this case presents a single question of law, and that question is: Can a married wo-
man whose husband is insane, but whose insanity has not been judicially declared, make a valid contract concerning her separate real property?
The answer to this question depends upon the construction to be given the act of March 11th, 1861, 1 R. S. 1876, p. 555. The 1st section of that act, omitting the enacting clause, reads as follows: “That all married women, or those who may be hereafter married, whose husbands are, or may be insane, are during the continuance of such insanity, hereby…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Tracey v. CrepinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Sperry v. DickinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Jocelyn v. Charles G.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Maloney v. Home Loan & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1933
- Teeter v. NewcomIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.