Legal Opinion
Claussen v. Chater
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 29, 1996No. Civil Action 95-5214 (AJL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action brought under sections 205(g) and 1631(c)(3) of the Social Security Act 1 (the “Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(e)(3), to appeal the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying the application of plaintiff Francine Claussen (“Claussen”) for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. 2 Jurisdiction is alleged pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3). For the reasons set forth below, the instant matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Akers v. CallahanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- DENGLER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- GATTO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- PERRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020