Lightfoot v. Wainwright
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Lightfoot appeals a denial, without hearing, of his Petition for Habeas Corpus. The only allegation which requires discussion is his claim that he was not given a written statement as to the evidence relied on and reasons for the disciplinary action. If this is true, appellant’s due process rights were denied. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 564-565, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); Kirby v. Blackledge, 530 F.2d 583, 585 (4th Cir. 1976). The failure to give appellant such a statement also violates Florida Administrative Rule 33-3.08(13)(m). The documents comprising the record below do…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Charles L. Kirby v. Stanley Blackledge, Warden of Central Prison, and v. Lee Bounds, Commissioner of the North Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jerry v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Strong v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Damyn v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981