Legal Opinion
Cheryl S. Stith v. Holly Sutherland, et al.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided February 25, 2026No. 5:25-cv-01340Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION CHERYL S. STITH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:25-cv-1340-HDM HOLLY SUTHERLAND, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Cheryl S. Stith, proceeding pro se, commenced this action against Defendants Dr. Holly Sutherland, Dr. Harold Brian Clayton, Tina Kimbrell, Laura Smith, and Dr. Josh Swindall (collectively, “Defendants”), all of whom are associated in some capacity with Hartselle City Schools in Hartselle, Alabama. The operative pleading in this matter is Stith’s Third Amended Complaint (the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.