Legal Opinion

Ian Owen Sharpe v. the United States 1

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 4, 2013No. 13-319 CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for Reconsideration; Pro Se Plaintiffs; Frivolous Claims; Sanctions Warranted

OPINION

HEWITT, Chief Judge

I. Background

Plaintiffs are inmates at the Federal Correctional Institution in Marianna, Florida. See generally Allegation of Fed. Constitutional Question Jurisdiction (Compl.) (Com plaint or Compl.), Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 1 (listing “[Federal Correctional Institution] Marianna” as plaintiffs’ address). Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in this court “ehal-leng[ing] the Constitutional Enactment validity” of federal bill H.R. 3190 (the bill), which was passed in 1948 as Pub.L. No.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beadles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Hickman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Ajamian v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Bigelow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API