Legal Opinion
St. Paul Intertribal Housing Board v. Reynolds
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 31, 1983No. Civ. 4-82-872PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
This action for declaratory and injunctive relief and monetary damages was brought by plaintiff St. Paul Intertribal Housing Board (the Board), a non-profit Minnesota corporation, against the defendant federal government agencies and officers. Plaintiff seeks a declaration that there is no legal impediment to the use of funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Housing Program (HUD Program) in the Board’s urban Indian housing project, injunctive relief restraining defendants…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Artichoke Joe's v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002
- Peyote Way Church of God, Inc. v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Little Earth of United Tribes, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- Dewakuku v. CuomoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.