Legal Opinion

Dore v. Schultz

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 8, 1984No. 83 Civ. 2649 (DNE)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This suit was instituted pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) and 2671, et seq., (“FTCA”). Plaintiffs, Shirley Dore and her infant son, seek tort damages from the defendants for injuries which, plaintiffs allege, resulted from defendants’ negligent enforcement of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101, et seq. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(l)-(3), (5) and (6).

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Shirley Dore is a United States citizen residing in Manhattan. In…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Haig v. AgeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Vera Zabala Clemente v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  3. Bower v. WeismanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Winant v. Carefree PoolsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
  5. Warshay v. Guinness PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API