Henriod v. East Tintic Development Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court of Utah County, Fourth District; 11m. A. B. Morgan, Judge. Action by Gus Henriod and others against the East Tintie Development Company and others. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.
The plaintiffs, as stockholders of the East Tintie Development Company, a corporation, hereinafter called company, brought this action against said' company and against the *247board of directors, composed of O. M. Richards, R. M. Kellogg, W. F. Giles, Thomas Beesley, and Harvey Cluif, to have certain acts of said board of directors set aside and annulled, and to have a receiver appointed to take possession of the property of said company, and to wind np its affairs as hereinafter stated. It is not necessary to refer to the pleadings.
The first assignment relates to the refusal of the district…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Inv. & Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Turney v. MorrisseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Ferrell v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gilna v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Houston v. Utah Lake Land, Water & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919