Johnson v. Sepulveda
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellant, Arthur Johnson, filed suit against appellees in February of 2003. The trial court dismissed appellant’s suit for want of prosecution on October 8, 2003. In this pro se appeal, appellant contends: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in not complying with his motion for recusal; and (2) the trial court erred in not setting and holding a hearing on his motion to reinstate. We affirm.
Motion for Recusal
Appellant argues in his first and fourth points of error that the trial court abused its discretion in “not complying” with his motion for recusal.
To…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thordson v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Gill v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Barron v. State Atty. Gen., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
- Cabrera v. Cedarapids Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Carson v. Serrano, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Willms v. Americas Tire Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Enriquez v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Andrews v. Stanton, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
- Arthur Johnson v. Robert E. Linkin, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Coshatt, Joseph DeWayne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.