Legal Opinion

Thordson v. City of Houston

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1991No. D-1194PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from the trial court’s failure to reinstate a wrongful discharge suit against the City of Houston after dismissing it for want of prosecution. Milton I. Thordson, petitioner, complains that the trial court’s failure to hold a hearing on his timely-filed, properly verified motion to reinstate was an abuse of discretion because it is required by Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 165a. We agree and reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for a hearing on the motion to reinstate.

Rule 165a(4) requires that the judge “shall set a hearing on the motion [to reinstate] as soon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gulf Coast Investment Corp. v. NASA 1 Business CenterTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Thordson v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. in the Interest of K.M.L., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Dueitt v. Arrowhead Lakes Property Owners, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  3. Myer v. Cuevas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  4. Enriquez v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  5. Rainbow Home Health, Inc. v. Schmidt, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API