Reynolds v. Alabama Department of Transportation
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The issue presented in the midst of the lengthy nonjury trial of this long-standing lawsuit is one that, surprisingly, has been rarely addressed in the civil context: whether and, if so, when an attorney may confer with a witness during breaks in testimony. In their motion for mistrial, the defendants assert that the court has improperly prohibit ed their attorneys from conferring with witnesses during breaks in their testimony. 1 The defendants broadly contend that, “The law is clear that parties and witnesses have a right to representation by counsel,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brake v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Schmidt v. Fortis InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
- In re Marriage of KeeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
- McDermott v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Monge v. DH Brewing IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025