Legal Opinion
Monge v. DH Brewing Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 6, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01294Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Natalie Monge, No. CV-24-01294-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 DH Brewing Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), Plaintiff Natalie Monge 16 moves for default judgment against Defendants DH Brewing Incorporated (“DH 17 Brewing”), DH Enterprises Restaurants L.L.C. (“DH Enterprises I”), DH Enterprises 18 Restaurants 2 L.L.C. (“DH Enterprises II”), and Doajo and Roxanne Hicks. (Doc. 34.) DH 19 Brewing, DH Enterprises I and II, and Doajo and Roxanne…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.