Legal Opinion

Schuster v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 5, 1970No. 69-870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was informed against, charged with buying, receiving or aiding in the concealment of stolen property, to wit: a credit card.1 The defendant waived jury trial, and was tried before the court. At the close of the state’s case the defendant moved for a directed verdict and judgment of acquittal. The motion was denied, following which the defendant produced evidence in his behalf including his testimony. After the defense rested the state produced a rebuttal witness. At the close of the case the defendant renewed his motion for acquittal, which was denied. Thereupon the trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Winton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  4. Worster v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. Newbold v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. Interest of BS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Yanks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Haberman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API