Hart v. State

Upon an indictment charging him in two counts with grand larceny and receiving stolen property knowing it to have been stolen the plaintiff in error was convicted on the second count and acquitted on the first.

To the judgment he took a writ of error and assigned many errors.

The tWenty-first assignment attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. That question was properly raised by a motion for a new trial which was overruled. The motion also contained as one of its grounds the alleged error of the court in overruling a motion to quash the indictment. There is no assignment…