Legal Opinion
Garfield National Bank of New York v. Wallach
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 13, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.
The defendant, who was an accommodation indorser of a promissory note, defends this suit with a plea, that the note was paid. Payment was alleged to have been made by the giving of a renewal note for the one in suit, dated February 2, 1926. The original note was made on October 2, 1925, for the sum of $5,000 by a corporation known as H. Kashins Company, and was indorsed by the defendant. The renewal note as the plaintiff asserts was made by the same concern and indorsed by it alone and through some inadvertence or other was not indorsed by the defendant.
The theory of the complaint is that the…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Bank of United States v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930
- Cohen v. RossmooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Home & City Savings Bank v. BilinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- American Trust Co. v. New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Cohen v. First National City BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.