Home & City Savings Bank v. Bilinski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mahoney, J.
Desirous of assisting their son in his business venture, on May 16, 1985 defendants John Bilinski and Dorothy M. Bilinski (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants) executed a $100,000 collateral security mortgage, ostensibly in return for plaintiffs extension of a $100,000 line of credit to the son’s corporation, 80 Microcomputer Services Inc. (hereinafter 80 Micro). The mortgage document contained the standard future advance clause, i.e., that the mortgage was intended to "secure any more debts now or in the future owed by [defendants] to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bank of California v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Galyn v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bank of New York v. CerasaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Galyn v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Snide v. LarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re EarlUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1992
- Home & City Savings Bank v. SperrazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Werner v. WernerNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. McAuliffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Gerrity Co. v. RiscicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.