State Of Washington v. Phillip Linch Schloredt
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 68495-7-1 Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. en en UNPUBLISHED OPINION PHILLIP LINCH SCHLOREDT, Appellant. FILED: September 30, 2013 Schindler, J. — When a court allows a defendant represented by counsel to file a motion pro se, no waiver of the right to counsel is necessary so long as the defendant does not assume core functions of counsel or has the assistance of experienced legal counsel. In this case, Phillip Linch Schloredt had the assistance of counsel and did not assume counsel's core functions when he filed his pro…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Personal Restraint of StensonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.