Legal Opinion
People v. Ruffin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 28, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting Mm upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds (Penal Law § 220.44 [2]), defendant contends in his main brief that his plea allocution was not factually sufficient. Defendant, on appeal, does not challenge the validity of his waiver of the right to appeal, however, and thus his contention is encompassed by that waiver (see People v Lewandowski, 82 AD3d 1602, 1602 [2011]). We further conclude that “the challenge by defendant [in his main brief] to the sufficiency of the evidence before the grand…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. Di RaffaeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. DunbarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. LewandowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. DickersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. HalseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- COPES, BRETT E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- HALSEY, CASEY J., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- MILLIMAN, SCOTT A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. HalseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013