Legal Opinion
Rong v. Liaoning Provincial Government
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 3, 2005No. CIV. 03-1687 RBWPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Court Judge.
The plaintiffs, Yang Rong (“Rong”), Rhea Yeung (“Yeung”), and the Broadsi-no Finance Company, Ltd. (“Broadsino”), brought this action against Liaoning Provincial Government (“LPG”) for conversion, expropriation, the violation of international law and unjust enrichment pursuant to the Commercial Activity and Expropriation Exceptions to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1330, 1605(a)(2)-(3) (2000). Currently before the Court is the Motion of Liaoning Provincial Government to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (“Def.’s Mot.”)…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kopff v. BattagliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Doe I v. State of IsraelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Nemariam v. Federal Democratic Republic of EthiopiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Peterson, John W. v. Royal Kingdom ArabiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.