Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bennett v. Walton County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 22, 2015No. 1D14-2571Published

1DissentMakar, J.

Karen and Reppard Bennett appeal the trial court’s ruling in favor of Walton County on their substantive due process claim, finding the land development code’s prohibition on “nonresidential uses” was facially invalid, a ruling that should be affirmed. The trial court, however, held the Bennetts’ as-applied substantive due process claim did not extend to the County’s executive actions, entering judgment for the County without addressing the merits of the claim. I agree that the Bennetts’ have stated a viable as-applied substantive due process claim under state law, but rather than adjudicate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United Yacht Brokers, Inc. v. GillespieSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Duncan E. MacKenzie v. City of Rockledge, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. City of Lauderhill v. RhamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API