Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Pena

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1989No. 18117Published

1ConcurrenceRansom, Justice

(specially concurring).

I concur only in the result of the majority opinion. We should avoid confusion between warrantless searches incident to an arrest, and warrantless searches of automobiles based on probable cause arising from observation of paraphernalia. Rather than to rely on the arrest cases cited in the majority opinion (People v. Jenkins, 77 A.D.2d 353, 432 N.Y.S.2d 956 (1980), and State v. Durell, 111 R.I. 582, 305 A.2d 104 (1973)), I specially concur in reliance upon cases that hold there is probable cause to conclude small amounts of contraband might be in the passenger…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garrett v. GoodwinDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. State v. DurrellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  4. People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API