Legal Opinion

Acushnet Company v. Beam, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 2, 2018No. AC 16-P-1611PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWolohojian, J.

*687 At issue is the interpretation, under New York law, of a provision in the stock purchase agreement pursuant to which Beam, Inc. (Beam), sold its subsidiary, Acushnet Company *688 (Acushnet). 2 More specifically, the parties disagree as to which of them is entitled to $16.62 million of value added tax (VAT) receivables carried on Acushnet's balance sheet at the time of the closing. Beam took the amount as a postclosing setoff for its own benefit; in response, Acushnet brought this suit. On cross motions for summary judgment, a judge of the Superior Court determined that the contract provision was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Vermont Teddy Bear Co. v. 538 Madison Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Kass v. KassNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. 67 Wall Street Co. v. Franklin National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Sav. Bank Life Ins. Co. of Mass.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  2. Hector Maza, Monjid Hamdan, and Cortney Mittelsteadt v. Giner, Inc. and Andrew BeltMassachusetts Superior Court · 2025
  3. Impact Technology Licensing , LLC, and Boston Technology Consultants Group, Inc. (d/B/A Impact Technology Development) v. Barry-Wehmiller Companies, Inc.; Carr Biosystems, LLC; Pneumatic Scale corp.(d/B/A "pneumatic Scale Angelus Corp."); \Massachusetts Superior Court · 2025
  4. Moshe Yanai, Rachel Yanai, and Michal International Investment LLC v. Zack Keinan, Individually and as General Partner of Scintilla Holdings, Ltd.; Scintilla Holdings, Ltd., as General Partner of Scintilla Fund, L.P.; And Boaz ToshavMassachusetts Superior Court · 2025
  5. Nagesh Mahanthappa, Solely in His Capacity as Representative of the Former Securityholders of Twistdx, Inc. v. Alere, Inc. and Innovacon, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API