Peter G. Eikenberry v. Nicholas P. Callahan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
On October 31, 1980, the District Court dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction a Bivens First Amendment action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a) by appellant against a former FBI official. 1 The District Court found that “to a legal certainty, damages in the instant case do not exceed $10,000.” 2 Appellant moved for reconsideration November 8, 1980, but this request was denied November 12. On December 1, 1980, the Federal Question Jurisdictional Amendments Act of 1980 3 became law, eliminating the $10,000 amount-in-controversy requirement for federal question…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Jaffke v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by27 opinions
- Brandt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Katherine Amen, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. City of Dearborn, a Municipal Corporation, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Alfred Morris v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Trout v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Claf McClam v. Mayor Marion Barry, Municipality of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.