Legal Opinion

Woodsville Fire District v. Cray

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 6, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The writ in the present action was entered at the January term, 1931. A default was originally ordered because of the defendant’s failure to file an affidavit of defence in compliance with Rule 33 of the Superior Court. But on May 4, 1931, new counsel having entered an appearance and filed the required affidavit, the order of default was vacated and the case reinstated on the docket.

Nothing further was done in the matter until the September term, 1934, when the case was marked for trial by the plaintiff. Defendant’s counsel wrote the defendant on May 23, June 5, and September 12, of that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  2. Hutchinson v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  3. Lamarre v. LamarreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  4. Shea v. StarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
  5. Watson v. CarvelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewellyn v. FollansbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  2. Lehigh Navigation Coal Co. v. Keene Coal Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  3. Cross v. LinskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. Pregent v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API