Legal Opinion
Armstrong Communications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 12, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLINS, Judge.
In these two consolidated cases, Armstrong Communications, Inc. (Armstrong) and Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg (Citizens) have filed cross-petitions for review of an April 28, 1999 order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission that found Citizens exempt under Section 251(f)(1)(A) of the Telecommunications Act 1 (Act) from interconnection obligations and granted Citizens a two-year suspension from these interconnection obligations. The Commission’s Order further held that Armstrong was technically and financially fit to provide facilities-based and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- SmithKline Beckman Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Alpha Auto Sales, Inc. v. Department of State, Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Graduate Health Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dee-Dee Cab, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003