Legal Opinion

421 Hudson Street Tenants Ass'n v. Abrams

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

This is a special proceeding inititated pursuant to CPLR *167article 78 for an order (1) annulling, as arbitrary and capricious, the Attorney-General’s acceptance for filing of the offering plan and first amendment thereof for the proposed condominium conversion of the premises known as 421 Hudson Street, New York, New York; or in the alternative, (2) directing that the Attorney-General of the State of New York require that the Sponsor of the condominium plan demonstrate that there were no excessive long-term vacancies in existence on the premises on the date…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whalen v. LefkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Gonkjur Associates v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Gonkjur Associates v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Forest Vistas Co. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Forest Vistas Co. v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API