Richelson v. Mariette
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Potter County. Hon. Joseph H. BoTRum, Judge. Action b}r Andrew Richelson against R. L- Mariette and another, to quiet title by annulling a guardian’s sale of plaintiff’s realty. From a judgment for defendant Mariette, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Potter County. Hon. Joseph H. BoTRum, Judge. Action b}r Andrew Richelson against R. L- Mariette and another, to quiet title by annulling a guardian’s sale of plaintiff’s realty. From a judgment for defendant Mariette, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. (i) Under point one of the opinion, Respondent cited: Section 303, Code Civil Procedure, as amended by Chapter 173, Laws 1913 ¡MacGregor v. Pierce, 17 S. D. 51, 95 N. W. 281; Moddie v. Breiland, 9 S. D. 506, 70 N. W. 637; Chapter 173, Laws 1913; Wenken v. Hall, 17 S. D. 305, 96 N. W. 103; French…
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.
Action to quiet title to a half section of land in Potter county. Defendant Clark made default. Trial to the court. Findings of fact and judgment for defendant Mariette. *576Motion for and order denying a new trial. Plaintiff appeals.
[i] Respondent contends that errors predicated upon the motion for a new trial, cannot be considered on this appeal. Respondent is clearly right in this contention, under the decisions of this court in Traxinger v. Ry. Co., 23 S. D. 90, 120 N. W. 770, and Regan v. Whittaker, 14 S. D. 373, 85 N. W. 863.
There was no notice of intention to move for a new trial. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pryor v. DowneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Bachelor v. KorbNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Blake v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Estate of BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Hatch v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Hawgood's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916