Legal Opinion

Winstead v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 2, 2010No. Civ. A. 04-887(JMF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case is before me for all purposes including trial. Currently pending before me and ready for resolution is the District of Columbia’s Motion in Limine [# 111] (“Defs. Mot.”). For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs are eleven current or former District of Columbia employees and the estates of two former District of Columbia employees who have made claims for disability compensation pursuant to the District of Columbia Comprehensive Merit Personnel System…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Shume v. Pearson Educ. Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. J.H.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  4. Shume v. Pearson Education Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. Williams v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API