Legal Opinion

Finch v. Centennial Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 7, 1994No. 93-413-APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHEA, Justice.

This matter came before the Supreme Court on appeal by the codefendant Arnica Mutual Insurance Company (Arnica), which filed a cross-claim against defendant Centennial Insurance Company (Centennial). Both parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion of Centennial. Such action, in effect, rejected Arnica’s argument for stacking the uninsured-motorist-insurance coverage on the eleven vehicles insured under Centennial’s fleet policy. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the Superior Court judgment in favor of Centennial on its cross-claim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  3. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. StanfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. Taft v. CerwonkaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martinelli v. the Travelers Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Roberge v. Travelers Prop. Casualty Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
  3. Cynthia A. Roberge v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of AmericaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2026
  4. Mancini v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  5. Shilo D. Horsman, individually, and in her capacity of as administratrix of the Estate of Eric Horsman and as parent and guardian of Jack Horsman, Matthew Horsman, and Mason Horsman v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of AmericaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API