Legal Opinion

S. A. Ruebel & Co. v. Morr

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1953No. 7794PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, P. J.

This is an action to recover a balance dué on a contract with the defendants, as the Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County. The issues were submitted to the court without a jury. There was a finding and judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was overruled and thereupon, in due time, this appeal was filed.

On November 23, 1949, the plaintiff entered into a written agreement with the defendants for “Furnishing the necessary labor and material to improve North Bend road No. 142 from Colerain avenue west to Vogel road, by grading, constructing a 40-foot…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Bank v. Cape Girardeau & Chester RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. American Awning & Tent Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jurgensen Co. v. FairbornOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API