Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oil appeal from the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of tlie court was delivered by
Trenchard, J.
The Ingersoll-Rand Company, the plaintiff below, sued to recover the value of certain machinery which it claimed was its property and was wrongly converted by the defendant to its use.
The record disclosed the following situation: Prondergasi & Clarkson had a contract with the United States government for the building of the Shoshone dam at Cody, Wyoming. *404They needed certain machinery for use in this work. The plaintiff, in writing, proposed to furnish them an IngersollRand air compressor “of the size and dimensions as set forth in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hayes v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Short v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Cruthers v. DonahueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Noyes v. Butler Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grossman Furniture Co. v. PierreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- S. A. Ruebel & Co. v. MorrOhio Court of Appeals · 1953