Legal Opinion

Dollard v. Depositors Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 2002No. WD 60492PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether an insurer may enforce a provision in a homeowner’s policy limiting replacement cost coverage by a depreciation factor until the property is actually replaced. Depositors Insurance Company (hereinafter “Depositors”) filed a motion for summary judgment on the policy claim of Mr. and Mrs. Dollard (hereinafter “the Dollards”) who filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. The trial court entered summary judgment for Depositors holding that § 379.150, RSMo 2000, 1 did not bar enforcement of the replacement cost limitation of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Non-Royalty Shoe Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Wells v. Missouri Property Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Tinsley v. Ætna InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. State Ex Rel. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Moody Station and GroceryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. In Re State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Manuel v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Porter v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Azim Aziz v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API