Keitz v. Unnamed Sponsors of Cocaine Research Study
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN E. CONRAD, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, Michael James Keitz (Keitz or plaintiff), proceeding pro se, filed this amended complaint on November 14, 2011, bringing two claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and one state law technical battery claim. The defendant had filed the original pro se complaint on August 26, 2011. However, on September 1, 2011, after granting the plaintiffs contemporaneously filed motion to proceed informa pauperis, the court dismissed the original complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), concluding that the plaintiff had failed to state a claim upon…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brady v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021