Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Yeskel

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 24, 1941No. Docket 124/604PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant, the holder of a judgment against William Yeskel, brings this bill of complaint.

The issue raised by the pleadings and the evidence involves the fraudulent use of judgments and corporate fictions to evade complainant's judgment. The defendants are William Yeskel, his son Stanley Yeskel and two corporations, namely, Stanley Trading Company and William Yeskel Sons, Inc.

Complainant sold and delivered merchandise to William Yeskel trading as William Yeskel and Company (a proprietorship which is not to be confused with William Yeskel Sons, Inc., a corporation), for which defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Trinity Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  2. Newark Ladder, C. v. Furniture Workers, C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  3. Trachman v. TrugmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  4. Perkins v. Trinity Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  5. Camden Safe Deposit Trust Co. v. GreenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jugan v. FriedmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Catabene v. WallnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Cohen v. DwyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Hudson County National Bank v. SouthworthNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API