Cowan v. Roberts.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by CWan, McClung & Co. against M. E. Eoberts & Co., beard by Judge W. A. Hohe and a jury, at May Term, 1903, of the Stuperior Court of Buncombe County. From a judgment for the defendants the plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomeey, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover an amount alleged to be due to them for goods and merchandise sold by them to the defendants. The defendant Eedmond in his answer denied that he was a partner in the concern of M. E. Eoberts & Co. at the time the goods were purchased by Eoberts, that firm having been dissolved before that time. On the trial Eedmond testified that he told the plaintiffs that the defendants were going out of business and notified them not to sell any more goods after that, and that Eedmond Bros, were going out of the firm of M. E. Eoberts & Co., but he at the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Jenkins Bros. Shoe Co. v. G. v. Renfrow & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Ring Furniture Co. v. BussellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- General Factors, Inc. v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- General Factors, Inc. v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Straus, Gunst & Co. v. T. O. Sparrow & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.