Legal Opinion

Craft v. United States

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 20, 1995No. IP 93-776-CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McKINNEY, District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiffs, Dale Craft, Rudolph Hamblin and William Block, and by the United States. For the reasons provided below, the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and the motion for summary judgment filed by the United States is GRANTED.

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts of this case are mostly undisputed. Plaintiffs, Dale Craft (“Craft”), Rudolph Hamblin (“Hamblin”), and William Block (“Block”) (collectively the “Officers”), are former…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raymond D. Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Byrne v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  3. Stanley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Goldman v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1998
  5. Kiczuk v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API