Legal Opinion

Seely v. Gilbert

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1943No. 28810PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

— This action was instituted October 9, 1939, to recover for an alleged assault and battery committed October 9, 1936, upon the person of plaintiff, who also alleged that, pursuant to a conspiracy entered into prior to October 9, 1936, by the defendants with each other, she was incarcerated in a sanitarium in the state of Kansas. Five persons were named parties defendant: D. C. Shepard, May O’Hara, Dr. Paul Whelan, Anne Gilbert, and Rebecca Green. No service was made on D. C. Shepard and May O’Hara, and they made no appearance in the action. Defendants Whelan, Gilbert, and Green were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. BlombergWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fite v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. High v. HighWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Washington Asphalt Co. v. Harold Kaeser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Boyles v. City of KennewickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Ennis v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API