Metropcs Communications, Inc. v. Porter
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
The order under review denying arbitration is reversed for a determination after an evidentiary hearing of the threshold issue of whether the arbitration clause was contained in a binding agreement between the parties. See Travelers Ins. Co. v. Irby Constr. Co. 816 So.2d 829, 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Melamed, 425 So.2d 127, 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Krutchik v. Chase Bank USA N.A., 531 F.Supp.2d 1359, 1365 (S.D.Fla.2008). We express no view as to the result of any other issue which may arise from that ruling. See McKenzie Check…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. MelamedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- McKenzie Check Advance of Florida, LLC v. BettsSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Briceno v. Sprint Spectrum, LPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Krutchik v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metropcs Communications v. Jorge PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Metropcs Communications, Inc. v. PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016