Hill v. Henry
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
Stevens, V. C.
This is a bill to quiet title, the cloud to be removed being a possible claim of a right to dig for black lead under an agreement made by the then owner of the land with one William Henry in the year 1810. Its peculiarity consists in the fact that, as the bill itself is framed, it contains no defendants except “William Henry, or his heirs, devisees, or personal representatives.” It alleges that William Henry is dead, and so the suit is not against him. Ho other individuals are specially named and so the suit is not against individuals but against classes, those classes being (1)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McDaniel v. McElvySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Maury v. TurnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Silver Camp Mining Co. v. DickertMontana Supreme Court · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.