Legal Opinion

Morrow Ex Rel. Morrow v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1938PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

At the time of the death of Robert Morrow, father of the infant plaintiffs, he was divorced. The cause of action, if any, relied upon by the plaintiffs, therefore, rests in the plaintiffs, his only next of kin. It does not appear from the record, and the plaintiffs do not contend, that there is any sufficient evidence tending to show that the train of the defendant company killed the deceased, and this is not an action for wrongful death. All the evidence tended to show that at the time the body was discovered on the morning of 11 November, 1934, the deceased had been dead twelve to sixteen…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larson v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Kyles v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Whitehurst v. . ElksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Stephenson v. . Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Lamm v. ShingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Altman v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API