Legal Opinion

National Can Co. v. Vinylex Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 26, 1988No. 87 C 3245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZAGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff National Can Company (“National”) brought a six-count complaint against defendant Vinylex Corporation (“Vinylex”). The dispute between the parties arose from National’s purchase from Vinylex of an allegedly defective product. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1332. Before the Court is Vinylex’s motion to dismiss Count VI of the complaint, in which National asserts a claim for implied indemnity premised on strict liability in tort. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

National manufactures…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package MacHinery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. Miller v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Textile Biocides Inc. v. Avecia Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API