Legal Opinion

Skelly Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1976No. 74-1675, 74-1789 and 75-1203PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

This is a consolidation of petitions filed by petitioner to review, under 15 U.S.C. § 717r(b), orders of the Federal Power Commission which rejected proposed rate increases. The review concerns the Commission policy established in Opinion No. 639 (48 F.P.C. 1299), Opinions Nos. 699 of June 21, 1974, and 699-H of December 4, 1974, generally referred to as the replacement contract policy. The application of this policy was dependent upon the “termination” of the producer’s base gas sales contract or to situations where such a contract had “expired of its own terms.” This was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Gulf Oil Corporation v. American Louisiana Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  5. Phillips Petroleum Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. J. M. Zachary v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. McCombs v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API