Legal Opinion

United States v. International Paint Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 6, 1948No. 4582PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Presiding Judge

The Government here seeks review and reversal of the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, sustaining the protest of appellee against the refusal of the Collector of Customs at the port of New York to allow drawback upon certain merchandise described in the protest as “Antifouling Semi Paste Paint,” exported in September 1944 under Drawback Entry No. 6888, the entry being *89liquidated “No Drawback,” on July 6, 1945. The claim of appellee was and is that the exported product was manufactured or produced from a substance broadly described in its brief as “certain imported…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  5. Klepper v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. California Industrial Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  3. Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  4. CPC International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. SDI Technologies Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API