Legal Opinion

Bickerstaff v. Prevost

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 16, 2012No. 4972Published

1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.

In'this appeal, Charles Bickerstaff and Barbara Magera (Appellants) argue the circuit court erred in finding it lacked jurisdiction to consider Appellants’ motion to set the rate of interest. Appellants contend: (1) the rate of interest applicable post-judgment was established in a prior order of the circuit court, and that order is the law of the case; (2) the circuit court erred in declining to consider matters not affected by this court’s decision in the initial appellate process; (3) a post-judgment interest rate of 1% per day is punitive and grossly disproportionate to the amount of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Turner Coleman, Inc. v. Ohio Construction & Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. PowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Renaissance Enterprises, Inc. v. Ocean Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Bickerstaff v. PrevostCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API