Legal Opinion
In re: Steven Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 24, 2016No. 16-13536-JPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Steven Jackson has filed a pro se application for permission to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion based on Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). Because Mr. Jackson already has filed one § 2255 motion in the past, his new motion must be “certified as provided in section 2244 by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals to contain ... a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2). “The court of appeals may authorize the filing of a second…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Isaac SeabrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Dimott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- In Re: Emilio GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- In re ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.