Foley v. Wabasha-Nelson Bridge Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Plaintiff sued to recover $2,450, and interest, on an employment contract, and was awarded a verdict by the jury. On defendant’s motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, the court granted judgment, from which plaintiff appeals.
The facts as to which there is no dispute may be thus stated: In 1929 defendant was incorporated. The only purpose or object was the construction and operation of a toll bridge with approaches across the Mississippi River at Wabasha, for which a franchise or permission had been secured. The venture proved…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carney v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Stoneman v. Fox Film Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Pickens Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Producers Coal Co. v. Mifflin Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
- Howard v. the Winton Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Lewis v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959