Legal Opinion

Foley v. Wabasha-Nelson Bridge Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1940No. 32,323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Plaintiff sued to recover $2,450, and interest, on an employment contract, and was awarded a verdict by the jury. On defendant’s motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, the court granted judgment, from which plaintiff appeals.

The facts as to which there is no dispute may be thus stated: In 1929 defendant was incorporated. The only purpose or object was the construction and operation of a toll bridge with approaches across the Mississippi River at Wabasha, for which a franchise or permission had been secured. The venture proved…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carney v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Stoneman v. Fox Film Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Pickens Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Producers Coal Co. v. Mifflin Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Howard v. the Winton Co.California Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Lewis v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API