Legal Opinion
Lauber v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: John Lauber (plaintiff) was injured while driving a tractor purchased from defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company and manufactured by defendant American Yard Products Division, WCI Outdoor Products, Inc. Plaintiff turned around to observe traffic, placing his hand on the rear fender of the tractor to balance himself, and his fingers were caught in the chains of the rear wheel. He commenced this action asserting causes of action for negligence, breach of warranty, and strict products liability.
Supreme Court properly granted defendants’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Liriano v. Hobart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Affuso v. Crestline Plastic Pipe Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Rochester Refrigerating Corp. v. Easy Heat, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wesp v. Carl Zeiss, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Burke v. Spartanics Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Lamb v. Kysor Industrial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Felle v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Yargeau v. LasertronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.