Legal Opinion

Wesp v. Carl Zeiss, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 2004PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*966Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Barbara Howe, J.), entered June 12, 2003. The order granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment in part by dismissing so much of the strict products liability and negligence causes of action that are predicated on manufacturing defect or failure to warn and otherwise denied the motion.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting that part of the motion with respect to the negligence and strict products liability causes of action insofar as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Romano v. StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Jana Davidson v. Rockwell International CorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. Almonte v. Averna Vision & Robotics, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2015
  3. Call v. Banner Metals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Fitzpatrick v. CurrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Maciarello v. Empire Comfort SystemsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API