Anderson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Judge.
The appellant challenges his conviction and sentence for lewd and lascivious assault upon a child. We reject his constitutional challenge to section 90.803(23)(c), Florida Statutes (1991), and his assertion that the trial court erred in admitting the hearsay statements of the child victim in this case. We write to address the appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion *110for judgment of acquittal. Although we affirm, we certify to the supreme court a question of great public importance regarding the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.
Prior…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Forehand v. School Bd. of Gulf CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995