Lundebrek v. Chamberlain Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the respondents and an order denying the appellant’s motion for a new trial or a hearing on the issue of allegedly improper jury instructions. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
The appellant commenced this action in April 1982, claiming that respondent Chamberlain Oil Company had negligently caused an oil spill in his yard, which in turn had caused damage to his property and had aggravated a preexisting asthma condition. Chamberlain sued respondent ServiceMas-ter of Willmar, Inc. for contribution.
Trial began on April 17,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cronquist v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Ramfjord v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Booth v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Sabraski v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Kukowski v. Wm. Miller Scrap Iron & Metal Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Charles Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. JurekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985