Legal Opinion

Lundebrek v. Chamberlain Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 29, 1985No. CO-84-1397PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the respondents and an order denying the appellant’s motion for a new trial or a hearing on the issue of allegedly improper jury instructions. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

The appellant commenced this action in April 1982, claiming that respondent Chamberlain Oil Company had negligently caused an oil spill in his yard, which in turn had caused damage to his property and had aggravated a preexisting asthma condition. Chamberlain sued respondent ServiceMas-ter of Willmar, Inc. for contribution.

Trial began on April 17,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cronquist v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Ramfjord v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Booth v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Sabraski v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Kukowski v. Wm. Miller Scrap Iron & Metal Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. St. Charles Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. JurekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API